The Influence of Politics on Media

The media has long been viewed as having the potential to be a check on political power, informing and educating the public about relevant issues and creating accountability for politicians. However, the relationship between politics and the media has often been fraught with tension.

In this article, we will explore how political views have influenced the role of media over time. While the news is inherently neutral, there are certain biases in reporting which tend to align with a politician’s or party’s principles.

What is Media Bias?

When we talk about the bias in the media, we are discussing the ideological slant that the media or particular publications have. In most cases, this will be inherent to the publication; however, it can also be a reflection of the editorial decisions that are being made by the publication.

When we talk about the bias of a publication, we mean the inclination to take a particular point of view when it comes to making editorial decisions. This could be in the form of leaning towards one political party or a political philosophy.

How does Politics Influence the Media?

The relationship between the media and politics influences the direction, control, and content of reporting, and these relationships vary depending on the country.

In democratic countries, the media often has an adversarial relationship with the government; however, in authoritarian countries, the relationship is usually a symbiotic one.

Political views have significantly impacted the role of media in a variety of ways. For example they can praise a country through headlines like “What is Amsterdam known for?” Such headline is too powerful that it can change people and world’s perception of the subject.

How does it Affect Us?

As discussed above, the media’s political bias can be seen as a problem, especially if one political party obtains a monopoly on the media; in this situation, it could be argued that the political control over the media is being exercised to further the political agenda of the controlling party, rather than for the good of the general public.

However, some argue that media bias is a good thing, as it allows the media to present facts from an angle that the reader/viewer will be most sympathetic towards.

Bribery Using Money and Precious Materials Such as Jewelry

The illegal bribery of authorities using money, commodities, or services in order to obtain an advantage is known as corruption.

Fraud, bribes, threats, extortion, and favoring relatives and friends are all examples of corruption (literally: corruption). For example, corruption is sometimes viewed as an essential economic resource since it allows the government to spend less money on civil servant salaries.

Bribery Using Money and Precious Materials Such as Jewelry

Because government salaries are so low in many nations, corruption is highly frequent and is considered more or less normal. Fines, for example, are frequently bought off the cops with a private settlement using money and jewelry. Sad thing is that any business such as Butterfly Jewelry, no longer has control over the commodity after purchase even if it will be used as a bribe. High-level corruption is more dangerous, and it is sometimes accompanied by human rights breaches; for example, to hide the acceptance of bribes, a government may use violence against journalists or trade union leaders.

The European Commission allows countries bordering Belarus to derogate from rules for the protection of asylum seekers.

International Corruption Ranking

Transparency International publishes an “index of perceived corruption” based on the experiences of businesspeople. According to 2016 data, countries like Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, and Norway have exceptionally low levels of corruption. The countries with the most corruption include Somalia, South Sudan, North Korea, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, and Libya. Human rights are violated as a result of corruption. Because people spend a considerable portion of their money on bribes, kickbacks, and improper payments, corruption threatens living standards. Workers’ rights, such as the right to work, a fair wage, workplace protections, and safety, are all harmed by corruption. The rule of law, due process, and legitimate government initiatives are all harmed by corruption.

Legal Abuses

Because the legal system is likewise corrupt, when the judiciary punishes corruption, it frequently hurts innocent individuals. Those who expose corruption are frequently threatened or persecuted. Amnesty International has documented scores of countries where judges have been corrupted, causing them to convict innocent people while failing to prosecute those who are truly culpable (often in high positions).

Corruption in Bangladesh and Cambodia

Rana Plaza, a Bangladeshi businessman, was sentenced to three years in prison for corruption in August 2017. He was found guilty of hiding information regarding his income from an anti-corruption panel, according to the judge. Plana was the owner of a clothes firm that went bankrupt in 2013. As a result, hundreds of people died. The accident had nothing to do with Plana’s conviction. Cambodia is quickly deforesting, owing to deep-seated corruption, which causes trees to vanish at a breakneck pace. Many logging corporations have ties to senior military and government figures. This allows them to go into a primitive forest and cut down trees without being disturbed. Even natural places that have been designated as protected are not exempt. Customs officials at the Vietnam border ignore the timber export prohibition in exchange for bribes.

Political Don’t Leave Hand On Phone

Politics can play a major role in marriage and divorce, but it is possible for spouses and ex-spouses from an array of ideologies to find common ground. If you desire an amicable divorce, you can achieve it with the help of this site visit scheidung kosten.

MPs have a hard time keeping their hands off their phones: on average, 38 percent of politicians are on a smartphone during a debate, according to new research. There are outliers of up to 90 percent. Chamber chairman Arib is strict but does not want a smartphone ban. Media scientist Sidney Vollmer pitched 21 debates and meetings in the House of Representatives with twelve students under the name of the Faction of Attention. Every ten minutes it was checked which of the MPs present was on their smartphone.

Overshot

What turned out? On average, 38 percent of MPs are on their phone. With outliers of 90 percent. MPs have gone too far, concludes Vollmer. “If we had counted more often, the percentage of MPs who were busy with his or her telephone would probably have been much higher. Because MPs look more often, but for less than ten minutes.” He understands that MPs are sometimes on their phones in this smartphone era. “But it happens so often. Moreover, politicians are there on behalf of the people, on our behalf. They have an exemplary function. It is important that they keep their attention and the attention goes to the people. They must be in charge of their own attention. ”

Petition

He says action is needed. For example, by giving MPs simplified smartphones that contain only a limited number of apps and on which screen time is limited. He has started a petition with co-initiators Myndr and the Bildung Academy. With the petition, the initiators want two things: stricter rules of conduct for MPs during meetings, and introducing the use of the simplified smartphone. Chamber chairman Khadija Arib has already expressed her annoyance about smartphone use several times. “I get a lot of letters from citizens about that.” Arib continues: “I think it is not so much a question of how often MPs and ministers check their telephones, but whether they follow the debate, listen to each other, and have an eye for each other,” she told RTL Nieuws. “As a Chamber, we have an exemplary role in this.”

To watch football

The President of the House has already taken telephones from MPs who were busy with their telephones. Ministers Grapperhaus and Van Nieuwenhuizen went through the dust last September because they were watching football during an important debate. “At the same time, mobile phones are part of this era,” Arib says. “All information comes in via telephones. Documents, motions, you name it. Especially during long debates, it is an important means of keeping abreast of what is happening outside the plenary room.” According to her, MPs are becoming more aware of the use of their telephones. “In debates that get a lot of attention, I sometimes draw their attention to it.”

𐌢